- Journal Name: International journal of social sciences review archives
- Short Name: IJSSRA
- ISSN(Print) : 3105-9449
- ISSN (Online) : 3105-9457
- Frequency : Semi-Annual
- Nature: Print and Online
- Submission: Via OJS System
- Languages of Publication: English
Peer Review Policy
The International Journal of Social Sciences Review Archives (IJSSRA) follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the publication of high-quality, original, and ethically sound scholarly work. The journal values academic integrity, transparency, and constructive critique throughout the review process.
1. Double-Blind Review Process
-
Both the reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process to ensure impartiality and objectivity.
-
Manuscripts are first evaluated by the editorial team to check for relevance, originality, and adherence to journal guidelines.
-
Submissions that meet initial criteria are forwarded to at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
2. Reviewer Selection
-
Reviewers are selected based on academic qualifications, subject expertise, and prior reviewing experience.
-
The journal maintains a diverse reviewer database to ensure fairness, inclusivity, and a global perspective.
3. Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate submissions based on the following criteria:
-
Originality and significance of the research
-
Theoretical and methodological rigor
-
Clarity and coherence of writing
-
Relevance to the field of social sciences
-
Adequacy of references and scholarly contribution
4. Editorial Decision
-
Based on reviewers' recommendations, the editorial board may decide to:
-
Accept the manuscript
-
Request minor or major revisions
-
Reject the manuscript
-
-
Authors are notified of the decision along with anonymized reviewer comments to support revisions or future submission efforts.
5. Turnaround Time
IJSSRA strives to complete the peer review process within 4 to 6 weeks of submission. However, this may vary depending on reviewer availability and the complexity of the manuscript.
6. Ethical Considerations
-
Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality and disclose any conflict of interest.
-
The journal adheres to COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines to ensure ethical review practices.